An interesting thought
If the Freedom From Religion Foundation claims that spending *any* tax money on religion is against the Constitution, and religion is defined as any system of belief, and atheism is a system of belief, isn't it wrong to use the courts, which are paid for with tax dollars, to promote atheism?
Comments
I suspect one could even make a good case for those three organizations to get religious exemption from taxes, and organize as 501(c)3 religious bodies, if they're not already.
Atheism is a system of belief as not collecting stamps is a hobby. Denying an assertion is not the same as making an assertion. You, no doubt, deny the divinity of Oden - does that make your (dis) belief a religion? Your suggestion to the contrary is erroneous
Having said that, the courts, through an error prone reading of the First Ammendment, grant additional state support to Atheism that other religions do not enjoy.
Still confusing belief with fact, are we?
Again, what is your evidence that the courts have granted state support to Atheism?
Sport as religion? You always were good for a laugh!
Pope Pete Rose. The Tabernacle of Wrigley Field. The Sacrament of the Third Quarter.
And yes, there are many who treat sports as sacred, the game as sacrament. I am by no means the first to notice.