An interesting thought

If the Freedom From Religion Foundation claims that spending *any* tax money on religion is against the Constitution, and religion is defined as any system of belief, and atheism is a system of belief, isn't it wrong to use the courts, which are paid for with tax dollars, to promote atheism?

Comments

Theodore M. Seeber said…
How is atheism a "system of belief"?
September 12, 2014 at 12:26 PM
Theodore M. Seeber said…
It asserts metaphysical arguments that cannot be proven by science alone. In addition to that, it now has denominations, such as Sunday Fellowship, the United States Atheism Association, and the Freedom From Religion Foundation.


I suspect one could even make a good case for those three organizations to get religious exemption from taxes, and organize as 501(c)3 religious bodies, if they're not already.
September 12, 2014 at 12:28 PM
Theodore M. Seeber said…
Mike, just how do the courts promote atheism? Of course, the courts mandate is to interpret and enforce the constitution.

Atheism is a system of belief as not collecting stamps is a hobby. Denying an assertion is not the same as making an assertion. You, no doubt, deny the divinity of Oden - does that make your (dis) belief a religion? Your suggestion to the contrary is erroneous
January 3, 2015 at 4:48 AM
Theodore M. Seeber said…
With the Sunday Assembly and the Freedom From Religion Foundation both claiming tax exempt status, legally they are now religions. And actually, I believe there once was a man named Odin, who traded an eye for wisdom, and became as much of a god as any of the other local God's at the time, of which there were several. He had his worshipers, his city, and his sacrifices, what more could any god ask?

Having said that, the courts, through an error prone reading of the First Ammendment, grant additional state support to Atheism that other religions do not enjoy.
January 3, 2015 at 5:04 AM
Theodore M. Seeber said…
Tax exempt = legal religion? Diamonds Girls Softball is a religion? I think not.
Still confusing belief with fact, are we?
Again, what is your evidence that the courts have granted state support to Atheism?
January 3, 2015 at 7:32 AM
Theodore M. Seeber said…
The continued use of the courts by The Freedom From Religion Foundation is the proof. And yes, sports often rises to religo on in the United States, always has.
January 3, 2015 at 7:40 AM
Theodore M. Seeber said…
Good one! The use of the courts to interpret the constitution is "proof" of state support of atheism! Can Christianity exist without casting itself as a victim? I would love to see Hindus demand their creation myth be taught in school and see how fast the churches will move to "prove" state support for Christianity!
Sport as religion? You always were good for a laugh!
Pope Pete Rose. The Tabernacle of Wrigley Field. The Sacrament of the Third Quarter.
January 3, 2015 at 8:09 AM
Theodore M. Seeber said…
I would be for teaching the Hindu creation story. It would be a good lesson in different forms of truth.

And yes, there are many who treat sports as sacred, the game as sacrament. I am by no means the first to notice.
January 3, 2015 at 8:16 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Father claims 15 year old girl is capable of consent in Lesbian Rape Case

Father claims 15 year old girl from another family is capable of consent : I'm beginning to really like the change in Florida's government.  First they stop handing out welfare checks to junkies.  Now they are treating Lesbians under the same rules as Heterosexuals, gasp, what a concept!  Don't sign this petition unless you are FOR statutory rape of younger girls by predatory lesbians. How many 18 year old boys have been prosecuted for having sex with 16 year old women under "minors can't give consent"?    Special treatment for lesbians?  Please, no.
Read more

Fundamentalist Atheism

Strange Notions is a new Disqus site run by Brandon Vogt to try to discuss Rationality and Reason with Athiests. He may well succeed with some, but there is one subset of atheism he will never succeed with. On Richard Dawkin's spectrum of theistic probability , those with a score 6 and above often fall into something I term fundamentalist atheism. Many of them come from fundamentalist Christian backgrounds, if not in their generation, then within three generations of their recent past. Fundamentalist Atheism starts with the assumption that the supernatural doesn't exist and that the natural world is all there is, and runs with it, denying any data to the contrary. I've always been one to consider the natural to be a subset of the supernatural- that is the only real difference between the natural and the supernatural to me is the line of the shared scientific knowledge of mankind. A scientist, therefore, if he is to learn anything new about the universe, needs to have h...
Read more

Call them what you like, Broken Families are still a TRAGEDY!

Yes, liberals value family , but not enough to recognize that a broken family is a tragedy. Divorce is actually worse than death as far as the grieving process goes- especially when there are children, custody battles, parental support, and alimony involved. And homosexuals raising children? That is tragic, not something to be celebrated. Maybe if we'd *recognize* that a broken family is a tragedy we would be more willing to say, pay taxes for WIC so that the single mother working a minimum wage job actually has the ability to choose life. Maybe we'd have more men willing to stick around and help raise the children they cause because the condom broke while they were stupidly using sex only for recreation. Maybe, just maybe, we'd be raising men instead of a generation of cowardly wimps who choose homosexuality and suicide over real life. Suffering and tragedy is valuable- but only if we recognize that it exists.
Read more