Duke University Graduate who Failed to Learn Her Faith

Duke University Graduate and Rich First Worlder to poor women of the world To eliminate poverty, eliminate the poor

Comments

Unknown said…
We get it. The Catholic Church opposes birth control. Ergo, being the faithful Catholic that you are, you also oppose it, no matter how badly it is needed and how unconscionable it is to tell people struggling to raise the children that they do have that they must have even more. We get it. That's just the way you are.
June 26, 2013 at 3:28 AM
Theodore M. Seeber said…
It is more than that- I am actively accusing first world rich people of using population control to take wealth away from the third world, thus causing people to struggle economically to begin with- and enable more of that wealth centralization by a form of slow genocide.
June 26, 2013 at 7:50 AM
Unknown said…
"using population control to take wealth away from the third world".

What wealth? You can't be serious. You think Bill and Melinda Gates are trying to help control population growth among the poor so they can acquire more wealth with less people vying for it? You don't think they are trying to help women lift themselves out of poverty by helping them plan their families? Your kind of thinking typifies how Catholicism is a real impediment to progress.
June 26, 2013 at 7:59 AM
Theodore M. Seeber said…
I am absolutely certain of it that their "trying to help women lift themselves out of poverty" consists entirely of keeping the next generation of the poor from being born- and that their only reason for wanting those women out of poverty to begin with is to create consumers who will spend their money on product rather than family.
June 26, 2013 at 8:49 AM
Unknown said…
That is just the most ridiculous line of thinking I have ever heard. Sure they don't want poor women to have so many kids. Where will they get the money to buy Xbox if they have too many mouths to feed? Creepy Catholic logic.
June 26, 2013 at 8:58 AM
Theodore M. Seeber said…
Yep, it's creepy to want more people in the world, isn't it?

I think I'd rather be that kind of a creep, than the kind who thinks we can eliminate poverty with a genocide of the poor.
June 26, 2013 at 4:06 PM
Unknown said…
"Yep, it's creepy to want more people in the world, isn't it? "

For people who can't afford to have any more kids, yes it is creepy. Not as creepy as your use of the word "genocide" in a discussion about birth control, though. That is really creepy.
June 26, 2013 at 5:47 PM
Theodore M. Seeber said…
THAT part should be creepy. We should be avoiding telling people that they shouldn't exist, which is what the pro-family-planning side does.

I should know, I've been told repeatedly that I'm not good enough for your brave new world and neither are my wife and son.

Eugenics is creepy. And it should be creepy.
June 27, 2013 at 11:00 AM
Unknown said…
Birth control is not about anyone being good enough. It is about avoiding unwanted pregnancies. Some of the arguments against it are creepy.
June 30, 2013 at 1:09 PM
Theodore M. Seeber said…
Birth control is avoiding the responsibility to create the next generation for material gain alone.

The message it sends is that some people aren't good enough to be in the world with you- and those some people are your own kids. That message spreads quite quickly to any parent with special needs children- who of course, are likely to spend more than they will earn in a lifetime, that in a world of materialism, they don't deserve to exist.

But of course, as a believer in euthanasia, you have repeatedly made very clear that the only value of a human life is only productive capacity; I'm just pointing out that some of us actually value human life beyond that.
July 1, 2013 at 5:46 AM
Theodore M. Seeber said…
The very idea of an unwanted pregnancy is in and of itself an insult of the highest order to somebody like me. How incredibly selfish and materialistic do you have to be to NOT want a pregnancy?

It doesn't matter if you have to shelter your 10 kids in cardboard shacks- the poor deserve to live also.
July 1, 2013 at 5:51 AM
Unknown said…
Birth control is not aimed at people with special needs. It is a decision that a couple, or a woman alone, would make that would allow them to enjoy sex without worrying about unwanted pregnancies. If people with special needs children take issue with that then that is their problem. No one is doing anything to them. It is none of their business. No one is questioning anyone's right to exist. No one is being denied life. If you don't exist, how can you be denied anything. What do you think that there are people waiting to be born?
July 1, 2013 at 8:01 AM
Unknown said…
"It doesn't matter if you have to shelter your 10 kids in cardboard shacks- the poor deserve to live also."

That's just an incredibly heartless point of view. You really think that the poor are being mistreated by being given access to birth control? How backwards can you get?
July 1, 2013 at 8:09 AM
Theodore M. Seeber said…
"Birth control is not aimed at people with special needs"

Not according to Margaret Sanger, whom you birth control advocates worship.

" No one is questioning anyone's right to exist."

Don't try to lie Bill, you're not good at it.

"That's just an incredibly heartless point of view. You really think that the poor are being mistreated by being given access to birth control? How backwards can you get?"

It is you who are backwards, insisting that the poor have no right to exist at all, just like Margaret Sanger did. You Family Planning folks are just naked greed, no compassion at all.
July 2, 2013 at 9:22 AM
Unknown said…
I never said the poor have no right to exist. They have a right not to be poor.
July 2, 2013 at 9:51 AM
Theodore M. Seeber said…
No, if you're for family planning, contraception, and abortion, you are directly saying that the poor have no right to exist.

If you were saying they don't have a right to be poor, you'd be for ending this farce of an economic system and making sure men were responsible instead of using contraception to avoid responsibility.
July 2, 2013 at 5:04 PM
Unknown said…
I get it. You don't like people using contraceptives. Get over it.
July 3, 2013 at 3:13 AM
Theodore M. Seeber said…
Nope, not that easy. Because you see, each fewer person on this planet robs from my child, in nearly imperceptible ways.
July 3, 2013 at 6:25 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Father claims 15 year old girl is capable of consent in Lesbian Rape Case

Father claims 15 year old girl from another family is capable of consent : I'm beginning to really like the change in Florida's government.  First they stop handing out welfare checks to junkies.  Now they are treating Lesbians under the same rules as Heterosexuals, gasp, what a concept!  Don't sign this petition unless you are FOR statutory rape of younger girls by predatory lesbians. How many 18 year old boys have been prosecuted for having sex with 16 year old women under "minors can't give consent"?    Special treatment for lesbians?  Please, no.
Read more

Fundamentalist Atheism

Strange Notions is a new Disqus site run by Brandon Vogt to try to discuss Rationality and Reason with Athiests. He may well succeed with some, but there is one subset of atheism he will never succeed with. On Richard Dawkin's spectrum of theistic probability , those with a score 6 and above often fall into something I term fundamentalist atheism. Many of them come from fundamentalist Christian backgrounds, if not in their generation, then within three generations of their recent past. Fundamentalist Atheism starts with the assumption that the supernatural doesn't exist and that the natural world is all there is, and runs with it, denying any data to the contrary. I've always been one to consider the natural to be a subset of the supernatural- that is the only real difference between the natural and the supernatural to me is the line of the shared scientific knowledge of mankind. A scientist, therefore, if he is to learn anything new about the universe, needs to have h...
Read more

Call them what you like, Broken Families are still a TRAGEDY!

Yes, liberals value family , but not enough to recognize that a broken family is a tragedy. Divorce is actually worse than death as far as the grieving process goes- especially when there are children, custody battles, parental support, and alimony involved. And homosexuals raising children? That is tragic, not something to be celebrated. Maybe if we'd *recognize* that a broken family is a tragedy we would be more willing to say, pay taxes for WIC so that the single mother working a minimum wage job actually has the ability to choose life. Maybe we'd have more men willing to stick around and help raise the children they cause because the condom broke while they were stupidly using sex only for recreation. Maybe, just maybe, we'd be raising men instead of a generation of cowardly wimps who choose homosexuality and suicide over real life. Suffering and tragedy is valuable- but only if we recognize that it exists.
Read more