I go after the genocide of the unwanted, in all of its forms, based on the fact that it is rank bigotry and destroys the entire philosophical basis for the country, including the Declaration of Independence and the Constituion. It is not a religious objection, it is a scientific one. Humans are humans, regardless of development stage. They are not "potential" or "future". They are not a different species. They are not just another lump of cells, and we have already proven that with the existence of in vitro fertilization. Likewise on the other end of life, our humanity is not defined by our ability to lift a spoon or know what time it is.
People who are pro choice are therefore genocidal maniacs, who hate the unwanted and unloved- and wish to implement the death penalty for the crime of being unwanted. That is what abortion and euthanasia are.
No country that supports genocide can have a legitimate government- at all.
If "freedom of religion" and "freedom of speech" lead to genocide, then those are no longer legitimate rights.
It is the very basis of law itself- do we have a law that discriminates against the unwanted and unloved, not just in allowing birth but also in allowing a natural death (In my state of Oregon, pro choicers have now gone so far as to say that a man who can no longer recognize that it is time for dinner or lift a spoon, should be starved to death) instead of involuntary euthanasia.
The measure of a country is in how we treat the unwanted.
No comments:
Post a Comment