The real intolerance of modern liberalism

Those who disagree are not human claims Justice Kennedy.

Comments

Theodore M. Seeber said…
Aren't they already?


But the very point is that you call them "homophobes and bigots"- you've decided that they aren't human. You have removed their humanity for merely agreeing with biological reality instead of fantasy, and you're willing to use the full power of government against them up to and including military might.
August 7, 2013 at 11:55 AM
Theodore M. Seeber said…
I never said they aren't human. You have to be human to be a homophobe or bigot. I have no interest in resorting to military might. It is easy enough to ignore them.
August 7, 2013 at 2:23 PM
Theodore M. Seeber said…
Then why not ignore them, instead of writing laws about them and forcing your opinion on them by threat of military?


I realize it was a Republican who showed the way (Abraham Lincoln, in the issue of slavery), but why compound the error?
August 8, 2013 at 12:57 PM
Theodore M. Seeber said…
Do you think I am forcing my opinion by threat of military?
August 10, 2013 at 4:01 PM
Theodore M. Seeber said…
Not you personally, but with the recent Supreme Court Decision and the new regulations surrounding this, the US Government certainly is. I expect one day within the next 40 years, it will be illegal to be heterosexual.
August 12, 2013 at 8:38 AM
Theodore M. Seeber said…
Why do you say things like that?
August 12, 2013 at 11:46 AM
Theodore M. Seeber said…
Because it is what I am seeing here in Oregon- where speaking out as a Catholic gets your church painted with swastikas, where you can get fired for speaking out on this topic.
August 12, 2013 at 1:45 PM
Theodore M. Seeber said…
You have a propensity to exaggerate.
August 13, 2013 at 4:48 AM
Theodore M. Seeber said…
You need to check your privilege, Easterner.
August 13, 2013 at 8:16 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Father claims 15 year old girl is capable of consent in Lesbian Rape Case

Father claims 15 year old girl from another family is capable of consent : I'm beginning to really like the change in Florida's government.  First they stop handing out welfare checks to junkies.  Now they are treating Lesbians under the same rules as Heterosexuals, gasp, what a concept!  Don't sign this petition unless you are FOR statutory rape of younger girls by predatory lesbians. How many 18 year old boys have been prosecuted for having sex with 16 year old women under "minors can't give consent"?    Special treatment for lesbians?  Please, no.
Read more

Call them what you like, Broken Families are still a TRAGEDY!

Yes, liberals value family , but not enough to recognize that a broken family is a tragedy. Divorce is actually worse than death as far as the grieving process goes- especially when there are children, custody battles, parental support, and alimony involved. And homosexuals raising children? That is tragic, not something to be celebrated. Maybe if we'd *recognize* that a broken family is a tragedy we would be more willing to say, pay taxes for WIC so that the single mother working a minimum wage job actually has the ability to choose life. Maybe we'd have more men willing to stick around and help raise the children they cause because the condom broke while they were stupidly using sex only for recreation. Maybe, just maybe, we'd be raising men instead of a generation of cowardly wimps who choose homosexuality and suicide over real life. Suffering and tragedy is valuable- but only if we recognize that it exists.
Read more

Fundamentalist Atheism

Strange Notions is a new Disqus site run by Brandon Vogt to try to discuss Rationality and Reason with Athiests. He may well succeed with some, but there is one subset of atheism he will never succeed with. On Richard Dawkin's spectrum of theistic probability , those with a score 6 and above often fall into something I term fundamentalist atheism. Many of them come from fundamentalist Christian backgrounds, if not in their generation, then within three generations of their recent past. Fundamentalist Atheism starts with the assumption that the supernatural doesn't exist and that the natural world is all there is, and runs with it, denying any data to the contrary. I've always been one to consider the natural to be a subset of the supernatural- that is the only real difference between the natural and the supernatural to me is the line of the shared scientific knowledge of mankind. A scientist, therefore, if he is to learn anything new about the universe, needs to have h...
Read more