Yes, liberals value family , but not enough to recognize that a broken family is a tragedy. Divorce is actually worse than death as far as the grieving process goes- especially when there are children, custody battles, parental support, and alimony involved. And homosexuals raising children? That is tragic, not something to be celebrated. Maybe if we'd *recognize* that a broken family is a tragedy we would be more willing to say, pay taxes for WIC so that the single mother working a minimum wage job actually has the ability to choose life. Maybe we'd have more men willing to stick around and help raise the children they cause because the condom broke while they were stupidly using sex only for recreation. Maybe, just maybe, we'd be raising men instead of a generation of cowardly wimps who choose homosexuality and suicide over real life. Suffering and tragedy is valuable- but only if we recognize that it exists.
Comments
So, if this is true, then I am choosing not to have faith at my own peril. Yeah. But it isn't, so....
But then again so is Zen Buddhism, on that scale.
The real point is that objective data isn't what we think it is. Most Americans think objective=repeatable, when in reality objective=outside one's own mind.
All the dogma was proclaimed 2000 years ago and hasn't changed, that's true. But there's a layer of doctrine *on top* of the dogma that changes whenever the magisterium thinks they are right (and they're darn careful about that, doctrine, on average, takes 854 years between first being proposed as a theological theory and being actually taught, and plenty of theological theories get proven wrong/useless along the way, just ask anybody who still believes in selling sacraments/sacramentals or in Limbo). In addition to that there's discipline, the small t traditions that are constantly being introduced, renewed, revoked, retranslated, re,re,re.
If anything, Catholic teaching from the magisterium is the prototype for the scientific method. It's just far more conservative than the scientific method- and requires a much, much higher standard of proof.
I don't know what proof you are talking about. Just about everything the Church declares is accepted on faith and does not need to be proven. That is the problem.