Yes, liberals value family , but not enough to recognize that a broken family is a tragedy. Divorce is actually worse than death as far as the grieving process goes- especially when there are children, custody battles, parental support, and alimony involved. And homosexuals raising children? That is tragic, not something to be celebrated. Maybe if we'd *recognize* that a broken family is a tragedy we would be more willing to say, pay taxes for WIC so that the single mother working a minimum wage job actually has the ability to choose life. Maybe we'd have more men willing to stick around and help raise the children they cause because the condom broke while they were stupidly using sex only for recreation. Maybe, just maybe, we'd be raising men instead of a generation of cowardly wimps who choose homosexuality and suicide over real life. Suffering and tragedy is valuable- but only if we recognize that it exists.
Comments
I don't know where you come up with these notions. They seem to be the product of an over active imagination and obsessive thinking. And what does the stock market have to do with it? You have a strange impression of East Coast liberals.
I realize that's a different form of pro-life than you are used to. Mainly because it protects human life from conception until natural death, not just before birth.
Republicans are liberals in that equation quite often- putting profit above people. And Democrats want to do it so much that they want to legalize forms of death.
I find American society on the other side of the Rockies to be quite foreign.
The CEOs are the smaller set, the East Coast Liberals are the superset, but the culture is 100% the same: a hatred of poverty so strong that you're willing to harm others to protect your own property.