The crowd has become the mob
It is amazing how intolerant of other cultures those asking for tolerance have become.
The only thing more amazing in this story, is how nobody noticed that the name of the Founder of the Legion of Christ, had the same root word in his name as the spanish word for "sissy". And of course- he was convicted of clergy abuse.
Comments
If you want to fight prejudice- start with your enemies, not your friends.
But yes, if the activists are going to act like a mob, then there is no reason to support them any more than I would support the skinheads for trying to create a white homeland in Cascadia by blowing up banks.
Had they instead gone for pure equality and a separation of Church and State on marriage law, every Athiest, Catholic, and Mormon would be voting for civil unions. Get the government out of our churches, is an argument conservatives can get behind.
But because they do not want equality, but instead want FORCED acceptance, they have opposition.
You can torture us all you want but like Blessed Jose, we will still cry Viva Christo Rey.
You're right. They don't need to resort to those things and they shouldn't. Your logic does not make sense if you say that those things make their cause wrong.
So far, nobody has. The best argument they have is to call everybody else a homophobe for not instantly accepting them, and then use these tactics to make sure all homophobes are ejected from society.
Has nothing to do with hate or bigotry, has to do with actual unbiased observation.
Also has nothing to do with religion, if you note, and everything to do with *staying unbiased* which is what you are supposed to do if you believe in the scientific method at all.
I suggest your own experience has damaged your bias to the point of not understanding basic evolution or biology.
They don't need to do any such thing. Nature does not dictate to us what we must do to get with the biological program. There is nothing in nature that prevents men from having sex with men or women with women. If that is their inclination, they are free to do it.
Sex, done successfully, requires the ability to make a child.
Your opinion is contrary to the facts, but what is new? Your entire philosophy is based on ignorance and a superstitious disregard for the supernatural.
That cannot exist. A superstitious belief in the supernatural makes more sense.
It is either one or the other. It cannot be both.
Fake popularizers of science, who wouldn't know a differential from an integral, are the ones who are afraid of the supernatural so much that they must deny it exists.
There is no supernatural in science. None whatsoever. Scientists check their beliefs in the supernatural at the front door before entering the lab, classroom, field, etc.
So I ask again, do you know everything, Bill? Or are there still discoveries yet to be made?
Also, the lab and classroom are NOT where real science can be done. All the lab and classroom are good for is learning old discoveries over and over. The real science- is in the supernatural, out where the unknown still exists.
Ok. You're not using the word the same way as I am. You are saying that those questions that scientists have not been able to answer yet involve the supernatural.
The supernatural that doesn't exist are the biblical "God", angels, demons, heaven, purgatory, hell, miracles, etc.
I don't believe when we find out how life began or why the universe appears to be designed, etc. that the answer will provide proof that lunatics who believe in all that will be proved right.