The violence of the peacemakers

To be pro-choice- is to be pro-violence. Violence against the unborn, is obvious, but also violence against women. The natural order of women is the exalted vocation of motherhood- the greatest thing any human being can be is a mother. Pro-choice feminism attacks motherhood directly- calling the housewife unfulfilled, somehow subservient to the man who has to work 2000 hours a year outside the home to pay for food, clothing and shelter.

The philosophy of Margaret Sanger, more children for the fit, fewer children for the unfit, is the core of Eugenics- but is based on the false idea that mankind has any way to know who is fit and who is unfit. It is a peace based on the ultimate in violence- the violence against the weak, the violence of the bully.

Comments

Wendy said…
I'm going to respectfully disagree with you Ted. A major part of my pro-choice stance rides on the ability for a woman to choose not to get pregnant in the first place (or when to get pregnant if she so chooses) as well as the mans ability to be involved in choices of procreation as well as the choice for a couple to give their unplanned child to another family for whatever reason. I think China's served as a particularly sad example- first they banned abortion, and as a result comes the strict two child rule which has resulted in countless infant murders over decades. Pro-choice and pro-life are not mutually exclusive.
December 12, 2011 at 8:16 AM
Theodore M. Seeber said…
Wendy Writes: " A major part of my pro-choice stance rides on the ability for a woman to choose not to get pregnant in the first place"

I have three major issues with that. The first is that it is statistically impossible- just about every form of contraception other than surgical sterilization is a fraud, having less than a 100% success rate.

The second is demographic- due to the widespread popularity of the contraceptive movement, we're going to see 2/3rds of the world's population die off in the next 50 years- of old age, with many fewer young people to replace them.

The third part is spiritualism based on science- as the science of evolution and biology teaches us, the purpose of sex is procreation, the ONLY reason it's enjoyable for anybody at all is to make sure the species survives. If we cut out the procreative part of sex, and leave only the recreation, what else does that get us other than extinction?
December 12, 2011 at 8:25 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Proposed Amendment 28

Section 1. That the following language be stricken as unworkable from the US Constitution, Article I, Section 10: "No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility. No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing it's inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and Controul of the Congress." Section 2. And be replaced with "All States, for the protection of their citizens, may reject any Treaty, Alliance, or Confe...
Read more

Father claims 15 year old girl is capable of consent in Lesbian Rape Case

Father claims 15 year old girl from another family is capable of consent : I'm beginning to really like the change in Florida's government.  First they stop handing out welfare checks to junkies.  Now they are treating Lesbians under the same rules as Heterosexuals, gasp, what a concept!  Don't sign this petition unless you are FOR statutory rape of younger girls by predatory lesbians. How many 18 year old boys have been prosecuted for having sex with 16 year old women under "minors can't give consent"?    Special treatment for lesbians?  Please, no.
Read more

Call them what you like, Broken Families are still a TRAGEDY!

Yes, liberals value family , but not enough to recognize that a broken family is a tragedy. Divorce is actually worse than death as far as the grieving process goes- especially when there are children, custody battles, parental support, and alimony involved. And homosexuals raising children? That is tragic, not something to be celebrated. Maybe if we'd *recognize* that a broken family is a tragedy we would be more willing to say, pay taxes for WIC so that the single mother working a minimum wage job actually has the ability to choose life. Maybe we'd have more men willing to stick around and help raise the children they cause because the condom broke while they were stupidly using sex only for recreation. Maybe, just maybe, we'd be raising men instead of a generation of cowardly wimps who choose homosexuality and suicide over real life. Suffering and tragedy is valuable- but only if we recognize that it exists.
Read more