Section 1. That the following language be stricken as unworkable from the US Constitution, Article I, Section 10: "No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility. No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing it's inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and Controul of the Congress." Section 2. And be replaced with "All States, for the protection of their citizens, may reject any Treaty, Alliance, or Confe...
Comments
I hope that your office move is going well.
I wanted to comment that I don't agree that the items you list are basic assumptions in the construction of our economic system. Rather, I think they are conventional wisdom that has crept into our system as it has evolved since the industrial revolution. In any event, I would agree that these notions must be taken into account as we try to rebuild our system. That is especially true of #3. As a enlightened society, we must first establish a dignified minimal living standard for all citizens.
Michael Hudson wrote a wonderful historical perspective earlier this week. I hope you find it interesting.
As to Michael Hudson's piece, it's something that has been troubling me for some time: the problem of freedom is that it includes the freedom to do evil. Having said that, I think subsidarity and a lack of anonymity go a LONG way- If Madoff had known he'd have to face his investors at church, school functions, civic duties, and wear many hats in addition to his chosen profession such as committee chairperson, mayor, or dog catcher, I doubt greatly that he would have either been able to amass millions OR chosen his ponzi scheme method of doing business.
There's a lot to be said for the small village/local government method of doing things, where no business has more than 40 employees and no city grows to more than 10,000.