The Supreme Court’s Misuse of Children to Justify Same-Sex Marriage | Crisis Magazine:
Interesting detail I missed in Justice Kennedy's argument:
- Since gays are allowed to adopt children or become custodial parents of children (because liberals want to deny the testimony of people like http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/author/robert-oscar-lopez/">Robert Lopez
who has collected a very large body of admitedly annecdotal evidence suggesting that perhaps being raised by two people of the same gender who have no sexual morality might not be the best environment for a child)
- http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2013/05/10034/">We must legalize gay marriage
for the adopted children to be able to pretend their family isn't broken (the family that the state broke to begin with by allowing gay adoption and homosexuals to become the custodial parent)
- So that we can pretend that the children will be all right, despite us having *directly* http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2012/08/6065/">deprived them of the opposite sex parent.
And this is what passes for logic in the people who run our country, circular as it is. We've destroyed the lives of children for the pleasure of adults, and we must keep the adults happy so that we don't further damage the children.